The Leadership Skill We Don’t Talk About Enough
- Lisa Schaefer
- May 25
- 3 min read
It’s easy to jump to conclusions.
Easy to make assumptions.
Easy to decide we already know what’s happening.
Easy to predict how a conversation will go or what someone “really meant.”
What’s harder is recognizing how much of that interpretation might be based on incomplete information.
The truth is, we rarely have the full story.
One of the most important leadership skills isn’t having the answers. It’s recognizing how much you don’t know yet.
That can feel deeply uncomfortable, especially for new leaders who often believe leadership means projecting confidence, certainty and decisiveness at all times. We think we’re supposed to walk into the room with the answers. We worry that curiosity might make us look uncertain or weak.
But leadership is inherently people-centered work. And people are...complicated. Which means leadership requires curiosity.
This idea has been showing up everywhere lately in the work we’ve been doing and the ideas we’ve been exploring.
We fill in the gaps
Brené Brown talks about how, in the absence of data, we create “first drafts” — stories we tell ourselves to make sense of what’s happening around us.
Adam Grant writes about the importance of “thinking like a scientist,” actively looking for reasons we might be wrong instead of searching for evidence that proves we’re right.
In emotional intelligence trainings last week, we talked about how the emotion showing up on the surface often isn’t the actual emotion underneath. Frustration might really be fear. Defensiveness might be embarrassment. Shutting down might be overwhelm.
And in a TEDTalk by Charles Duhigg, he explores the idea that sometimes people aren’t even having the same conversation at all. One person thinks the discussion is practical. The other is experiencing it emotionally. Both walk away confused, frustrated and unheard.
Different ideas. Same uncomfortable truth:
Our brains are wired to fill in gaps.
To create certainty.
To make quick judgments.
Understanding isn’t the same as agreeing
Other people’s perspectives are shaped by experiences, emotions and information we may not fully understand — but they still feel completely real to the person holding them. And leaders ignore that reality at their own risk.
That doesn’t mean every perspective is healthy, productive or acceptable. Understanding context doesn’t remove accountability. But it does help us respond more effectively.
Because when we assume we already know the full story, we often choose responses that make situations worse instead of better.
We label someone as difficult before considering what else might be happening.
We assume resistance when someone may actually be confused.
We react defensively instead of getting curious.
We focus on intent while ignoring impact.
We try to solve the wrong problem because we never slowed down long enough to understand the real one.
If we’re honest, most of us do this faster than we realize. But good leadership often requires resisting that instinct long enough to ask better questions.
To be clear, this takes practice.
It can feel uncomfortable to set aside our initial assumptions, especially when we’re stressed, frustrated or trying to appear confident. Curiosity can feel vulnerable because it requires admitting we may not fully understand the situation yet.
We won’t always get it right. But leadership gets stronger when we keep trying anyway.
What this looks like on a random Tuesday
On a random Tuesday in the office, this can look surprisingly simple:
Pausing before reacting to an email that feels sharp or dismissive.
Recognizing that someone’s frustration may have very little to do with you.
Checking whether everyone in the meeting is actually solving the same problem.
Separating assumptions from facts.
Saying:
“Help me understand.”
“Tell me more.”
“I may not have the full picture yet.”
It looks like listening fully instead of listening for confirmation that you’re already right. It looks like staying calm enough to respond intentionally instead of emotionally.
It looks like balancing honesty with compassion. Accountability with curiosity. Confidence with humility.
The leaders who keep learning
Leadership isn’t about knowing everything.
It’s about creating environments where people feel respected, heard and safe enough to communicate honestly.
That kind of trust is rarely built by the leader who always has the answers.
It’s built by the leader willing to keep learning.






Comments