This Could Have Been an Email
- Lisa Schaefer
- Jan 19
- 3 min read
Why One-on-One Meetings Matter — and How to Make Them Useful Instead of Dreaded
Ever been in a meeting where you can almost hear the collective thought:
This could have been an email.
For many people, that’s exactly how they feel about one-on-one meetings — and that’s a problem.
When one-on-ones are done poorly, they feel like wasted time, awkward small talk or a weekly dose of micromanagement. When they’re done well, they’re one of the most effective leadership tools you have.
The difference isn’t the meeting itself.
It’s the intention behind it.
Why Do People Dread One-on-Ones?
Most people don’t dread one-on-ones because they dislike conversation. They dread them because too often, these meetings:
Turn into status updates that could have been shared in writing
Feel one-sided, with the employee reporting and the leader reacting
Only happen when something is wrong
Lack focus or follow-through
Feel performative rather than supportive
Over time, that creates anxiety instead of connection.
People walk in wondering:
Am I in trouble? Is this a test? What are we even doing here?
That’s not what one-on-ones are meant to be.
What One-on-Ones Are Actually For
At their best, one-on-one meetings provide consistent space to:
Check progress on goals and priorities
Celebrate wins that might otherwise go unseen
Identify roadblocks and problem-solve together
Clarify expectations, development opportunities, and next steps
Surface performance concerns early — before annual reviews
They're less about monitoring performance and more about creating clarity — for both the leader and the employee.
One-on-ones are one of the few places alignment, trust and development can happen intentionally.
Put Them on the Calendar — and Protect Them
One-on-ones don’t work if they’re optional.
Establish a regular cadence and stick to it. Weekly may make sense for new roles or fast-moving work; monthly may be enough where there’s more day-to-day visibility or otherwise regular interactions.
Keep them to 30 minutes or less. Don’t cancel them simply to clear calendar space — and if you don’t need the full time, don’t drag them out.
Consistency matters more than length.
Set an Agenda — and Share It
One-on-ones shouldn’t be a surprise for either person.
A simple, consistent framework helps both sides prepare and reduces anxiety about what the meeting “means.”
A solid agenda might include:
Progress on goals and priorities
What’s going well
Challenges or roadblocks
Workload and capacity
Growth or longer-term goals
Support needed from the leader
That’s it.
The goal isn’t to review every task completed. It’s to focus on what matters most and what needs attention now. You don’t need all the answers — your job is to create space for the conversation.
Keep the Meeting Focused
Treat one-on-ones as protected time:
notifications off
phones face down
laptops closed unless needed
Knowing you have someone’s full attention — even briefly — builds trust more than people realize.
One-on-Ones Don’t Replace Ongoing Communication
Regular one-on-ones don’t mean issues should wait weeks to be addressed.
If something needs attention in the moment, raise it. But having dedicated time on the calendar helps everyone pause and ask:
Does this need immediate action — or can it wait for our one-on-one?
Done well, one-on-ones often reduce follow-up meetings, interruptions and rework. They also create continuity — a reliable rhythm that reassures people that important conversations about priorities, expectations and progress have a place to land.
Not Just for Direct Reports
Even without formal reporting lines, one-on-ones can be effective with:
Project partners
Cross-department colleagues
Team leads you work closely with
Used intentionally, they help break down silos and strengthen alignment — especially in complex organizations.
The Bottom Line
One-on-one meetings aren’t about checking a box — and they aren’t the only meetings leaders should be having. Team meetings, project meetings, and all-staff conversations serve different purposes and matter just as much.
But one-on-ones remain one of the few consistent spaces leaders have to create clarity, trust and momentum — or slowly erode them.
When done with intention, structure and follow-through, one-on-ones stop feeling like something people dread and start becoming something they rely on.
And if your one-on-ones currently feel like a chore?
That’s not a failure.
It’s a signal.
A signal that a small shift in purpose, structure, or mindset could make them far more valuable for everyone involved.






Comments