When It Shouldn't Feel This Hard
- Lisa Schaefer
- Mar 2
- 2 min read
Most organizations know how to assemble good pieces.
Talented people.
Clear mission.
Experienced board members.
Dedicated staff.
On paper, it looks solid.
And yet…
You can have great bricks — and still feel like the wall is wobbling.
You might be thinking:
Why is decision-making this hard?
Why do meetings feel circular?
Why do we keep revisiting the same conversations?
Why does every issue feel heavier than it should?
When that happens, it’s tempting to swap out a brick.
Blame the board.
Blame staff.
Rewrite the strategic plan.
Sometimes, that’s necessary.
But more often?
It’s not the bricks.
It’s the space between them.
The Invisible Dynamics
What actually holds organizations together rarely shows up in a strategic plan.
It looks like:
Clear expectations about who decides what
Trust between board and staff
Follow-through that builds credibility
Coaching instead of correcting
Shared norms about how disagreement happens
These things are hard to name. And they rarely feel urgent. They feel like “we’ll get to that when we have time.”
But when they’re weak, even small issues start to feel structural.
Meetings drag.
Energy drains.
Decisions stall.
Good people get tired.
I see this most often in associations and mission-driven organizations.
The leaders are capable.
The work matters.
The time and energy are finite.
From the outside, it looks like a strategy problem.
From the inside, it feels like friction.
And friction, over time, turns capable leaders into exhausted ones.
So Where Do You Start?
If you walk into your office tomorrow thinking,
“This shouldn’t feel this hard,”
start with diagnosis — not overhaul.
Here are a few simple questions to pressure-test the glue:
1. Are we clear on who decides what?
If you asked three leaders to describe your decision-making process, would you get the same answer?
2. Do our meetings produce movement?
At the end of the last three meetings, was it clear what happens next — and who owns it?
3. Are we coaching… or correcting?
When something goes sideways, do we default to blame, or to learning?
4. Are we revisiting issues because they’re complex — or because we never truly decided?
5. If an outside peer observed one of our meetings, what patterns would they notice that we no longer see?
Sometimes the most powerful next step is a conversation with a trusted peer, someone who can see things you can’t because they aren’t as close as you are.
Or ask your board chair, “Where does this feel harder than it should?”
Or quietly map how decisions have actually been made over the past six months — not how you think they’re made.
Small diagnostics reveal big dynamics.
Strong organizations aren’t just built from capable people.
They’re strengthened by clear expectations, disciplined follow-through and healthy tension.
You don’t always need new bricks.
Sometimes you just need to reinforce the connections.
And when those connections are strong?
You don’t eliminate hard work.
You eliminate unnecessary friction.






Comments